Palafox-Lugo v. Lombardo
| Jesus Palafox-Lugo |
| Joseph Lombardo |
| 2:2018cv01294 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 EXHIBIT to #9 REPLY to [8 ]RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; filed by Petitioner Jesus Palafox-Lugo. (Vail, Alexander) |
| Filing 9 REPLY to #8 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Jesus Palafox-Lugo. (Vail, Alexander) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Joseph Lombardo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Geinzer, Martina) |
| Filing 7 USM Return re #6 Order. Joseph Lombardo served on 8/15/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. (SLD) |
Filing 6
ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this Order upon the Respondent by having the United States Marshal promptly serve both documents on Joseph Lombardo. Respondent shall file and serve an answer or other response to the #1 Petition within 20 days of the date that this Order is entered. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - Petition and Order hand delivered to USM - SLD)
|
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT to #4 RESPONSE to #3 Order to Show Cause; filed by Petitioner Jesus Palafox-Lugo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-H, #2 Exhibits I-M)(Vail, Alexander) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #3 Order to Show Cause, filed by Petitioner Jesus Palafox-Lugo. (Vail, Alexander) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that within 20 days of entry of this order, petitioner shall show cause in writing why the petition should not be dismissed without prejudice. No extension of time will be granted to respond to this order except in the most compelling of circumstances. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET to Assign Judges in Civil Case, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Jesus Palafox-Lugo. (Vail, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0978-5158913) by Jesus Palafox-Lugo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order re Custody)(Vail, Alexander) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (SLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Palafox-Lugo v. Lombardo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jesus Palafox-Lugo | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Randolph Vail |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Joseph Lombardo | |
| Represented By: | Martina Geinzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
