Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Treasure Island, LLC
| Hawk Technology Systems, LLC |
| Treasure Island, LLC |
| 2:2018cv01306 |
| July 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Richard F Boulware |
| George Foley |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service Upon Treasure Island, LLC re #1 Complaint, #8 Summons Issued, #4 Certificate of Interested Parties by Plaintiff Hawk Technology Systems, LLC. (Lambeth, Kurt) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Treasure Island, LLC re #1 Complaint. (MMM) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Treasure Island, LLC by Plaintiff Hawk Technology Systems, LLC. (Lambeth, Kurt) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE re #5 Proposed Summons. Summons not issued due to attorney's information not listed pursuant to FRCP 4C. Attorney Kurt Lambeth advised to download and complete updated "AO 440 (Rev. 6/12) Summons in a Civil Action" form from Court's Website www.nvd.uscourts.gov in accordance with FRCP 4C and refile as a separate event using "Proposed Summons" event. (no image attached) (TR) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Hawk Technology Systems, LLC. (Lambeth, Kurt) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Hawk Technology Systems, LLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Lambeth, Kurt) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Certificate of Interested Parties. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file its Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than September 12, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
| Filing 2 AO 120 - REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent or trademark. E-mailed to the US Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (MMM) |
| Filing 1 First COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5160324) by Hawk Technology LLC. Proof of service due by 10/15/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lambeth, Kurt) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. Nature of Suit: 830 Patent Case (MMM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Treasure Island, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Treasure Island, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kurt C. Lambeth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
