Ware v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Camille Ware
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv01320
Filed: July 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Carl W Hoffman
Referring Judge: James C Mahan
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement between Camille Ware and Equifax by Camille Ware. (Krieger, David)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Stipulation; Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 8/24/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
August 1, 2018 Filing 7 First STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Austin, Bradley)
July 19, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #2 Certificate of Interested Parties, #5 Notice of Corrected Image/Document by Plaintiff Camille Ware. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Krieger, David)
July 19, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re 4 Notice Attorney Action Required, by Plaintiff Camille Ware. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Krieger, David)
July 19, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE: Attorney Action Required to #2 Certificate of Interested Parties. ERROR: Document is missing the name of the defendant and the case number. CORRECTION: Attorney David Kreiger advised to correct the deficiencies and file a Notice of Corrected Image/Document event under the Notices category and link to #2 Certificate of Interested Parties. (no image attached) (DKJ)
July 19, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC re #1 Complaint. (MR)
July 19, 2018 Filing 2 View #6 Corrected Image CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Camille Ware. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) Modified on 7/19/2018 re corrected image and to reflect document still does not contain the case number (DKJ).
July 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5163536) by Camille Ware. Proof of service due by 10/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Equifax)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
July 19, 2018 Case assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (MR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ware v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC
Represented By: Bradley T Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Camille Ware
Represented By: David H. Krieger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?