Ware v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Camille Ware |
Equifax Information Services, LLC |
2:2018cv01320 |
July 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W Hoffman |
James C Mahan |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement between Camille Ware and Equifax by Camille Ware. (Krieger, David) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Stipulation; Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 8/24/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 7 First STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Austin, Bradley) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #2 Certificate of Interested Parties, #5 Notice of Corrected Image/Document by Plaintiff Camille Ware. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Krieger, David) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re 4 Notice Attorney Action Required, by Plaintiff Camille Ware. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Krieger, David) |
Filing 4 NOTICE: Attorney Action Required to #2 Certificate of Interested Parties. ERROR: Document is missing the name of the defendant and the case number. CORRECTION: Attorney David Kreiger advised to correct the deficiencies and file a Notice of Corrected Image/Document event under the Notices category and link to #2 Certificate of Interested Parties. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
Filing 2 View #6 Corrected Image CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Camille Ware. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) Modified on 7/19/2018 re corrected image and to reflect document still does not contain the case number (DKJ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5163536) by Camille Ware. Proof of service due by 10/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Equifax)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ware v. Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
Represented By: | Bradley T Austin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Camille Ware | |
Represented By: | David H. Krieger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.