Ultramax Products Ltd. v. Mitchell
Ultramax Products Ltd. |
Anthony Michael Mitchell |
2:2018cv01862 |
September 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
Carl W Hoffman |
Robert C Jones |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Judge Robert C. Jones for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 2:18-cv-01862-RCJ-CWH. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/1/2018. The Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey is no longer assigned to this case. Pursuant to General Order No. 2011-03, IT IS ORDERED that this action is referred to the Clerk for random reassignment to one of the designated patent pilot program judges for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CS) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Ultramax Products Ltd. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Other Affiliate DX PRODUCTS LTD for Ultramax Products Ltd. added. (Bayramoglu, Nihat) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE. The Corporate Disclosure Statement should be docketed as a separate entry. Attorney Nihat Bayramoglu is advised to refile the Corporate Disclosure Statement selecting the correct event "Certificate of Interested Parties" located under the "Commencement of an Action" category and add all corporate parents and/or interested parties. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
Filing 3 AO 120 - REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent or trademark. E-mailed to the US Patent and Trademark Office. (JM) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Anthony Michael Mitchell. (JM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTHONY MICHAEL MITCHELL (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5256171) by ULTRAMAX PRODUCTS LTD. Proof of service due by 12/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Summons, #5 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark)(Bayramoglu, Nihat) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. Nature of Suit: 830 Patent Case (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ultramax Products Ltd. v. Mitchell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Anthony Michael Mitchell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ultramax Products Ltd. | |
Represented By: | Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.