Anaya et al v. Eldorado Resorts Corp.
| Michelle Anaya and Ray Anaya |
| Eldorado Resorts Corp. d/b/a Eldorado Development Corp. and Eldorado Resorts Corp. |
| Totten, Franqui, Davis & Burk, LLC |
| 2:2018cv02308 |
| December 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| George Foley |
| Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/28/2019. IT IS ORDERED that #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond is GRANTED. The response to #12 Motion to Dismiss is due February 18, 2019.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BEL) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (ADR) |
Filing 18
SCHEDULING ORDER Re: #17 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 6/10/2019. Motions due by 7/10/2019. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/9/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/28/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
| Filing 17 PROPOSED Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by Defendant Eldorado Resorts Corp. (Silvestri, Phillip) |
| Filing 16 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Eldorado Resorts Corp.. (Silvestri, Phillip) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #12 Motion to Dismiss, by Counter Claimant Eldorado Resorts Corp.. (Silvestri, Phillip) |
| Filing 14 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Eldorado Resorts Corp.. (Silvestri, Phillip) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #4 Answer to Petition for Removal,,, Counterclaim,, filed by Michelle Anaya, Ray Anaya.(Burk, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss re: #4 COUNTERCLAIM ; filed by Counter Defendant Totten, Franqui, Davis & Burk, LLC. Responses due by 1/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter of Representation, #2 Exhibit Answer and Counterclaim) (Burk, Christopher) Document nor filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(d) by attorney Christopher Dale Burk. Court corrected entry on 1/15/2019 (RFJ). |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to #7 Motion to Remand to State Court by Defendant Eldorado Resorts Corp.. Replies due by 1/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Composite Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Composite Exhibit 4) (Silvestri, Phillip) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: #4 Counterclaim. Totten, Franqui, Davis & Burk, LLC answer due 1/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
| Filing 9 First STIPULATION for extension of time to file responsive pleading by Counter Defendants Michelle Anaya, Ray Anaya. (Burk, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service re #4 Answer to Petition for Removal,,, Counterclaim,, #6 Summons Issued by Counter Claimant Eldorado Resorts Corp.. (Silvestri, Phillip) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiffs Michelle Anaya, Ray Anaya. Responses due by 1/4/2019. (Burk, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Totten, Franqui, Davis & Burk, LLC re #4 Counterclaim. (ADR) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Counter Claimant Eldorado Resorts Corp.. (Silvestri, Phillip) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, (, Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 1/26/2019.), COUNTERCLAIM against Michelle Anaya, Ray Anaya, Totten, Franqui, Davis & Burk, LLC by Eldorado Resorts Corp.. filed by Eldorado Resorts Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Silvestri, Phillip) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/6/2018. Statement regarding removed action is due by 12/21/2018. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 1/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
| Case assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (ADR) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Eldorado Resorts Corp. d/b/a Eldorado Development Corp.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Silvestri, Phillip) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-18-778133-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5347290) by Eldorado Resorts Corp. d/b/a Eldorado Development Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Silvestri, Phillip) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
