Flores, et al. vs. Aleksandrov, et al.
| Ramon Flores and Socorro Flores |
| Vladimir Aleksandrov and Triple D Express, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv02356 |
| December 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Intradistrict Transfer to Northern Division. See case number 3:18cv589 (no image attached) (TR) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendants Vladimir Aleksandrov, Triple D Express, Inc.. (Rosenthal, Harold) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants Vladimir Aleksandrov, Triple D Express, Inc.. (Rosenthal, Harold) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants Vladimir Aleksandrov, Triple D Express, Inc.. (Rosenthal, Harold) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eleventh Judicial District Court, Case Number CV18-12647, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5356747) by Vladimir Aleksandrov, Triple D Express, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Rosenthal, Harold) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
