Teal et al. v. United States of America
Jeannette Teal and Russell Teal |
United States of America |
2:2019cv00263 |
February 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Miranda M Du |
Cam Ferenbach |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 DECLARATION of Service re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Jeannette Teal. (Gage, Ivy) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (KW) |
Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Summons by Plaintiff Jeannette Teal. (Gage, Ivy) |
![]() |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Jeannette Teal. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Gage, Ivy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jeannette Teal (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5430499) by Jeannette Teal. Proof of service due by 5/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gage, Ivy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.