StoAmigo International, LLC v. Cheng et al
StoAmigo International, LLC |
Lisa Cheng and Kevin Hobbs |
2:2019cv00900 |
May 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Cam Ferenbach |
James C Mahan |
Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Civil Case Terminated per #4 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (MR) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff StoAmigo International, LLC. (Kaplan, David) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by StoAmigo International, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Duvon Corporation for StoAmigo International, LLC added. (Kaplan, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against StoAmigo International, LLC (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5565136) by StoAmigo International, LLC. Proof of service due by 8/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons to Cheng, #5 Summons to Hobbs)(Kaplan, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.