Orr et al v. Irvine
Jancie Perry and Brandon Orr |
Robert Irvine |
2:2019cv01011 |
June 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Kent J Dawson |
Brenda Weksler |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #5 Order, addressed to Brandon Orr. Envelope marked "Return to Sender"; no new address. (ADR) |
Filing 5 ORDER that Plaintiff must file a notice with his current address with the court by 7/24/2019. If Plaintiff does not update his address by that date, the court will recommend dismissal of this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 6/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #2 Advisory Letter Pro Se non-habeas addressed to Brandon Orr. Envelope marked "Return to Sender-Refused"; Addressee Unknown. (JQC) |
Filing 3 Docketed in this case in error by clerk's office. Document is terminated. ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (JQC) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (JQC) (Main Document 2 replaced on 6/13/2019) (JQC). |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff Brandon Orr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(JQC) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (RT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.