Mehta-Shreve v. The TJX Companies, Inc. et al
| Sonali Mehta-Shreve |
| Jeremy Jacobs and The TJX Companies, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv01086 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Carl W Hoffman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Jeremy Jacob's ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by Jeremy Jacobs.(Lowry, Michael) |
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response to #6 Motion to Dismiss, by Defendant Jeremy Jacobs. (Lowry, Michael) |
| Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE that due to the retirement of U.S. Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman, this case is reassigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 2:19-cv-01086-RFB-DJA. (no image attached) (ADR) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to #6 Motion to Dismiss, by Plaintiff Sonali Mehta-Shreve. Replies due by 8/12/2019. (Tingey, Bruce) |
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Filer's account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #11 . Attorney John Taylor Oblad is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (MMM) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (SLD) |
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER Granting #9 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 12/21/2019. Motions due by 1/19/2020. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/18/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 5-1(b). ECF No. #11 was not filed pursuant to LR IC 5-1(b) by attorneys Justin Dewey and Bruce Tingey. Please note the signatory must be the attorney or pro se party who electronically files the document. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. Do NOT refile. (no image attached) (MMM) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Sonali Mehta-Shreve. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Tingey, Bruce) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE regarding ECF No. #8 , #9 . The documents are not in compliance with LR IA 10-2, as the case number is deficient. Counsel is advised to correct the case number to 2:19-cv-01086-RFB-CWH for future filings. No further action required regarding #8 and #9 at this time. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by Defendant The TJX Companies, Inc. (Lowry, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant The TJX Companies, Inc.. (Lowry, Michael) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Jeremy Jacobs. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Lowry, Michael) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Jeremy Jacobs. Responses due by 8/5/2019. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/5/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Service) (Lowry, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant The TJX Companies, Inc.. (Lowry, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/24/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 7/9/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 7/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by The TJX Companies, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 8/8/2019.(Lowry, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by The TJX Companies, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Lowry, Michael) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-19-795992-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5598290) by The TJX Companies, Inc.. Proof of service due by 9/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint)(Lowry, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
