Espinosa v. CoreCivic, Inc.
| Michael Espinosa |
| Corrections Corporation of America and CoreCivic |
| 2:2019cv01617 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER Re: #17 Order on Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (JM) |
|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER granting #16 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order; Discovery due by 6/12/2020. Motions due by 7/24/2020. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
| Filing 16 Joint Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Corrections Corporation of America. (Lee, Jacob) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/6/2019. Pending before the Court is the proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 13. In violation of the local rules, the signature block for court approval begins on a separate page. See Local Rule IA 6-2. In addition, the discovery plan seeks a three-step expert disclosure process without any explanation why the Court should depart from the default two-step process. See Local Rule 26-1(b)(3). Accordingly, the proposed discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. An amended proposed discovery plan must be filed by November 8, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TM) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendant Corrections Corporation of America. (Lee, Jacob) |
| Filing 13 Joint Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Corrections Corporation of America. (Lee, Jacob) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to #5 Motion to Dismiss,, by Defendant Corrections Corporation of America. (Lee, Jacob) |
| Filing 11 Joint STATUS REPORT Pursuant to the September 13, 2019 Minute Order (Doc. 2) by Defendant Corrections Corporation of America. (Lee, Jacob) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #7 Stipulation; Re: #5 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due 10/11/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #8 Response by Plaintiff Michael Espinosa. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Mueller, Craig) |
| Filing 8 View Corrected Image #9 as to RESPONSE to #5 Motion to Dismiss,, by Plaintiff Michael Espinosa. Replies due by 10/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Mueller, Craig) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to File Opposition to #5 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Michael Espinosa. (Mueller, Craig) Modified to link to underlying motion in accordance with the Local Rules on 10/9/2019 (EDS). |
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Corrections Corporation of America. (Lee, Jacob) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Corrections Corporation of America. Responses due by 10/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits 1 - 9, #2 Exhibit 1 - Complaint 12/4/2017, #3 Exhibit 2 - 1st Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit 3 - Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, #5 Exhibit 4 - Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss, #6 Exhibit 5 - Order Denying Motion to Dismiss, #7 Exhibit 6 - Order Granting Writ of Mandamus, #8 Exhibit 7 - Declaration of R. Swinea, #9 Exhibit 8 - Declaration of Jacob B. Lee, #10 Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of 6/25/2018 Hearing) (Lee, Jacob) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Corrections Corporation of America. (Lee, Jacob) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Correction Corporation of America. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (JM) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/13/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 9/28/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 10/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Case Number A-19-799515-C (Dept. No. 2), (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5701656) by CoreCivic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Filings, #3 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Filing Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment, #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement and Certificate of Interested Parties)(Lee, Jacob) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
