Saldana-Jacinto v. GEICO Casualty Company
| Julieanna Saldana-Jacinto |
| GEICO Casualty Company |
| 2:2019cv02001 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Defendant GEICO Casualty Company's ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by GEICO Casualty Company. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 2/13/2020.(Hansard, Wade) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 12 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (JQC) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER Granting #10 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 6/10/2020. Motions due by 7/10/2020. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/10/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 12/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 10 Joint Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Julieanna Saldana-Jacinto. (Lee, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED Plaintiff's second cause of action for a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and third cause of action concerning Nevada's Trade Practices Act against GEICO Casualty Company are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that #6 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and #7 Motion to Stay, are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Plaintiff's second cause of action for a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and third cause of action concerning Nevadas Trade Practices Act against GEICO Casualty Company by Plaintiff Julieanna Saldana-Jacinto. (Lee, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Stay Case by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. (Hansard, Wade) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. Responses due by 12/9/2019. (Hansard, Wade) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/18/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 12/3/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 12/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. (Hansard, Wade) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by GEICO Casualty Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Other Affiliate Government Employees Insurance Company for GEICO Casualty Company added. (Hansard, Wade) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County Nevada, Case Number A-19-803761-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5780676) by GEICO Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hansard, Wade) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Saldana-Jacinto v. GEICO Casualty Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GEICO Casualty Company | |
| Represented By: | Renee Maxfield |
| Represented By: | Jonathan W Carlson |
| Represented By: | Wade M. Hansard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Julieanna Saldana-Jacinto | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan B. Lee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
