Ederi et al v. Wolf et al
| Avidor Shalom Ederi and Taylor Jean Gerlicher |
| Chad F Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ken Cuccinelli and United States of America |
| 2:2019cv02066 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (MR) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiffs Avidor Shalom Ederi, Taylor Jean Gerlicher. (Snavely, Luther) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5796870) by Avidor Shalom Ederi, Taylor Jean Gerlicher. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Snavely, Luther) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (SLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
