Mitchell et al v. Nye County, Nevada et al
Plaintiff: Kayla Mitchell and Karl Mitchell
Defendant: Sharon Wehrly, Harry Williams, Nye County, Nevada, Susan Ryhal and Nye County Sheriff's Office
Case Number: 2:2020cv00086
Filed: January 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Referring Judge: Andrew P Gordon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2020 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE of violation of Local Rule LR IA 10-2. Attorney Action Required to ECF Nos. #9 and #10 . Documents not properly formatted. Counsel Arlette Newvine is advised to correct the deficiency and refile using the event Notice of Corrected Image/Document and link to #9 and #10 , respectively. (no image attached) (MMM)
January 14, 2020 Filing 12 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (SLD)
January 14, 2020 Filing 11 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
January 14, 2020 Filing 10 CLIENT VERIFICATION re #1 Complaint, by attorney Arlette Newvine on behalf of Plaintiff Kayla Mitchell. (Newvine, Arlette)
January 14, 2020 Filing 9 CLIENT VERIFICATION re #1 Complaint, by attorney Arlette Newvine on behalf of Plaintiff Karl Mitchell. (Newvine, Arlette)
January 14, 2020 Filing 8 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Harry Williams by Plaintiffs Karl Mitchell, Kayla Mitchell. (Newvine, Arlette)
January 14, 2020 Filing 7 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Sharon Wehrly by Plaintiffs Karl Mitchell, Kayla Mitchell. (Newvine, Arlette)
January 14, 2020 Filing 6 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Susan Ryhal by Plaintiffs Karl Mitchell, Kayla Mitchell. (Newvine, Arlette)
January 14, 2020 Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Nye County, Nevada by Plaintiffs Karl Mitchell, Kayla Mitchell. (Newvine, Arlette)
January 14, 2020 Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Nye County Sheriff's Office by Plaintiffs Karl Mitchell, Kayla Mitchell. (Newvine, Arlette)
January 14, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiffs Karl Mitchell, Kayla Mitchell. (Newvine, Arlette)
January 14, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Karl Mitchell, Kayla Mitchell. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Newvine, Arlette)
January 14, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5844753) by Karl Mitchell, Kayla Mitchell. Proof of service due by 4/13/2020. (Newvine, Arlette) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
January 14, 2020 Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (SLD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell et al v. Nye County, Nevada et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharon Wehrly
Represented By: Brent L Ryman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harry Williams
Represented By: Brent L Ryman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nye County, Nevada
Represented By: Brent L Ryman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan Ryhal
Represented By: Brent L Ryman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nye County Sheriff's Office
Represented By: Brent L Ryman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kayla Mitchell
Represented By: Arlette Newvine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karl Mitchell
Represented By: Arlette Newvine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?