Ramirez et al v. Culley et al
| Daniel Mosso Ramirez and Christopher Njingu |
| Matthew T Albence, Captain, Thedrick Andres, Robert Culley and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| 2:2020cv00609 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Thedrick Andres, Captain. (JM) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Matthew T Albence, Robert Culley, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (JM) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiffs Christopher Njingu, Daniel Mosso Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed, #2 Summons Proposed, #3 Summons Proposed, #4 Summons Proposed, #5 Summons Proposed, #6 Summons Proposed) (Levy, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiffs Christopher Njingu, Daniel Mosso Ramirez. (Levy, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0978-5947138) by Daniel Mosso Ramirez, Christopher Njingu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Levy, Nicole) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. ***Emergency motion previously filed in case.***. DJ to be notified. (DRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
