Marquez v. Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois
| 2:2020cv01247 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER granting ECF No. 25 Stipulation for Dismissal. Plaintiff's Complaint filed against SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear its own respective fees and costs herein. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 9/15/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Stipulation re: 20 Motion for Summary Judgment - Responses due by 5/2/2022. Replies due by 5/16/2022. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/6/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Stipulation; Discovery due by 10/11/2021. Motions due by 11/10/2021. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/10/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 5/14/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marquez v. Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
