Baluma v. Patel
| Baluma, S.A., d/b/a Enjoy Punta del Este & Casino and Baluma, S.A. doing business as Enjoy Punta del Este & Casino |
| Pritesh Patel |
| 2:2020cv01398 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Kent J Dawson |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/24/2020 Re: #11 , #12 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Telephonic Hearing set for 10/19/2020 at 01:00 PM. The call-in telephone number is (888) 273-3658, access code: 3912597. The call must be made five minutes prior to the hearing time. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 12 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Baluma, S.A.. (Miltenberger, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Pritesh Patel. (Edwards, Michael) |
| Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Baluma, S.A.. (Miltenberger, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Baluma, S.A. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Enjoy Consultora S.A.,, Corporate Parent Enjoy Guarantee Trust, Corporate Parent Enjoy Gestion Limitada, Corporate Parent Enjoy S.A., Other Affiliate TMF Trust Company (Uruguay) S.A., Other Affiliate UMB Bank, N.A. for Baluma, S.A. added. (Miltenberger, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Pritesh Patel. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Edwards, Michael) |
| Filing 7 REPLY to Response to #3 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Pritesh Patel. (Edwards, Michael) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #3 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Baluma, S.A.. Replies due by 8/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Credit Fact Sheet, Application, and Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Feb 27 2019 Draw Request, #3 Exhibit 3 - March 5 2019 Draw Request, #4 Exhibit 4 - Markers) (Miltenberger, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 Statement in Removal by Pritesh Patel. (Edwards, Michael) Modified text on 8/12/2020 (EDS). |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 5-1(b). ECF No. #3 Motion to Dismiss was not filed pursuant to LR IC 5-1(b). Please note the signatory must be the attorney or pro se party who electronically files the document. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. (no image attached) (EDS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Pritesh Patel. Responses due by 8/14/2020. (Edwards, Michael) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Kent J. Dawson on 7/28/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 8/12/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/27/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (HAM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Case Number A-20-815878-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-6100211) by Pritesh Patel. (Edwards, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
