Rinear v. Saul
Tracy Lynn Rinear |
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
2:2020cv01557 |
August 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Brenda Weksler |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RETURN CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT as to Social Security Administration re #7 Certified Mail Receipt. (JM) |
Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS re #5 Complaint, #6 Summons Issued as to USA. (JM) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (JM - cc: USM) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul by Tracy Lynn Rinear. Proof of service due by 1/3/2021. (JM) |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (MMM) |
Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (MMM) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Tracy Lynn Rinear. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Tracy Lynn Rinear. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex.A to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, #4 Summons OGC, #5 Summons USAG, #6 Summons USAO) (Taylor, Hal) Modified on 8/24/2020 (MMM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.