All Things Garage LLC v. Dunseath
| All Things Garage LLC |
| Dwayne Dunseath |
| 2:2020cv01598 |
| August 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response to #5 Motion to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff All Things Garage LLC. (Johnson, Allyson) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #5 Motion to Remand to State Court by Defendant Dwayne Dunseath. Replies due by 10/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu declaration ISO response in opposition, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2) (Bayramoglu, Nihat) |
| Filing 6 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Dwayne Dunseath. (Bayramoglu, Nihat) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court re #1 Petition for Removal,,, by Plaintiff All Things Garage LLC. Responses due by 10/7/2020. (Johnson, Allyson) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Dwayne Dunseath. (Bayramoglu, Nihat) |
| Filing 3 AO 120 - REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent or trademark. E-mailed to the US Patent and Trademark Office. (HAM) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/31/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 9/15/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 9/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. Nature of Suit: 830/835 Patent Case (HAM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-20-817911-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-6147892) by Dwayne Dunseath. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Initial Disclosure, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Statement, #4 Exhibit Answer, #5 Exhibit Affidavit of Service, #6 Exhibit First Motion to Dismiss, #7 Exhibit First Notice of Noncompliant Document, #8 Exhibit Second Motion to Dismiss, #9 Exhibit Secon Notice of Noncompliant Document, #10 Exhibit Electronic Docket, #11 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bayramoglu, Nihat) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: All Things Garage LLC v. Dunseath | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: All Things Garage LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey R Sylvester |
| Represented By: | Allyson R. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dwayne Dunseath | |
| Represented By: | Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
