Davis v. Bluth et al
| Raymond Davis |
| Adam Gill and Jacqueline Bluth |
| 2:2020cv01696 |
| September 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Raymond Davis. Address updated to 4901 E Bonanza Rd, Unit 165, Las Vegas, NV 89110. (JQC) Modified on 11/2/2020 to restrict access per LR IC 6-1 (MMM). (Main Document 9 replaced on 11/3/2020) (JQC). (Main Document 9 replaced on 11/3/2020) (JQC). |
Filing 8
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that #6 Magistrate Judge Youchah's report and recommendation is Accepted. Plaintiff Raymond Davis's first, second, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth causes of action against defendant Jaqueline Bluth are dismissed without prejudice. Davis may file an amended complaint consistent with Magistrate Judge Youchahs report and recommendation and this order by 11/25/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/26/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Denying #5 Motion to Vacate as moot. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/26/2020.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER and Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #4 Plaintiffs Application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and, if Plaintiff files an amended complaint that states a claim, Plaintiff shall not be required to pay the filing fee of four hundred dollars. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs First Cause of Action alleging Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment violations, and Second, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action alleging Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment violations against Eighth Judicial District Court Judge Bluth be dismissed without prejudice. See Order for Details. Objections to R&R due by 10/19/2020. Amended Complaint deadline: 11/4/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 10/5/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Vacate 10/5/2020 trial date of Eighth Judicial District Court Case C-19-342946-1. (JQC) Modified docket text on 9/28/2020 (MMM). |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Raymond Davis. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (HAM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that on or before 10/15/2020, Plaintiff shall either pay the full $400 filing fee for a civil action (which includes the $350 filing fee and the $50 administrative fee) or file with the Court: See Order for Details. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff does not file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis with all three documents or pay the full $400 filing fee for a civil action on or before 10/15/2020, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for Plaintiff to refile the case with the Court, under a new case number. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 9/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - prisoner ifp/instructions sent to P - JQC)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (JQC) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (JQC) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (RT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
