Thomas v. Central Research et al
| Gary E. Thomas |
| US Department of Education and Central Research |
| 2:2020cv01777 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Kent J Dawson |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 2:20-cv-01777-RFB-VCF. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/5/2020. By Deputy Clerk: D. Saavedra. With good cause appearing, the Honorable Judge Kent J. Dawson recuses himself in this action. IT IS ORDERED that this action is referred to the Clerk for random reassignment of this case for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS) |
| Filing 3 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 400, receipt number NVLAS072096 (JM) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (JM) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (JM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (RT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
