Mulcahy v. Kerns
| Tim Mulcahy |
| Cedric Kerns |
| 2:2020cv01788 |
| September 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Real Property: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #8 and #9 Orders, addressed to Tim Mulcahy. (HAM) |
Filing 9
ORDER. Plaintiff must file a notice with his current address with the Court by December 4, 2020. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to the district judge that this case be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 11/4/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion to Cease and Desist (ECF No. #2 ) be denied. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Motion for Immediate Relief (ECF No. #3 ) be denied. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Motion for Peremptory Writ of Prohibition (ECF No. #5 ) be denied. Objections to R&R due by 11/17/2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Extend Time to File Response (ECF No. #6 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff wants to proceed with this case, he must file a complaint by December 4, 2020. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to the district judge that this case be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 11/3/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) Modified on 11/4/2020 (HAM).
|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #6 Motion to Extend/Shorten Time addressed to Tim Mulcahy. (HAM) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Extend Time to File Response (First Request) re #5 Motion by Plaintiff Tim Mulcahy. (HAM) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Peremptory Writ of Prohibition in support of #2 Petition to Cease and Desist by Plaintiff Tim Mulcahy. Responses due by 10/27/2020. (HAM) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBITS in support of #2 Petition for Cease and Desist Order by Plaintiff Tim Mulcahy. (HAM) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Immediate Relief by Plaintiff Tim Mulcahy. Responses due by 10/12/2020. (HAM) |
| Filing 2 Petition for Cease and Desist Order by Plaintiff Tim Mulcahy. Responses due by 10/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (HAM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/25/2020: #4 Declaration) (HAM). |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 400, receipt number NVLAS071992 (HAM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (RT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mulcahy v. Kerns | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cedric Kerns | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tim Mulcahy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
