Keller v. Saul
Plaintiff: Dustin Aaron Keller
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2021cv00041
Filed: January 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2021 Filing 8 Intradistrict Transfer to Northern Division. Reno Case No. 3:21-cv-00065. (no image attached) (JQC)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this action is transferred to the unofficial northern division of this District for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/28/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
January 27, 2021 Filing 6 Amended MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dustin Aaron Keller. CONSENT to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. section 636(c), I voluntarily consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (Kalagian, Marc)
January 8, 2021 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul by Dustin Aaron Keller. No changes to parties. (Kalagian, Marc)
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. Plaintiff's #1 application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED without prejudice. The Court will retain Plaintiff's complaint, but will not file it until the matter of the filing fee is resolved. No later than 2/8/2021, Plaintiff shall either make the necessary arrangements to pay the filing fee, accompanied by a copy of this order, or file a complete and accurate application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
January 8, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (AF)
January 8, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Dustin Aaron Keller. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kalagian, Marc)
January 8, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dustin Aaron Keller. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Kalagian, Marc) Modified on 1/8/2021 (AF).
January 8, 2021 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (AF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keller v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dustin Aaron Keller
Represented By: Marc V Kalagian
Represented By: Leonard Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?