Jenkins v. Office Depot, Inc.
| Samuel Jenkins |
| Office Depot, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00204 |
| February 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (DRS) |
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER granting #13 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 9/3/2021. Motions due by 10/4/2021. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/3/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/18/2021.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 13 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Office Depot, Inc.. (Burden, Jack) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #11 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order without prejudice. No later than March 18, 2021, the parties must file a joint proposed discovery plan that fully complies with the Courts Local Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/15/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) Modified to add deadline on 3/15/2021 (DRS).
|
| Filing 11 Amended Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order re #10 Order on Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order,,, by Plaintiff Samuel Jenkins. (Roy, Eric) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER denying #9 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order without prejudice. Joint Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 3/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/9/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 9 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Samuel Jenkins. (Roy, Eric) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 3/8/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/1/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Office Depot, Inc.. (Burden, Jack) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: #4 Order to Show Cause. Deadlines terminated; case shall not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at this time. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/16/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to #4 Order by Defendant Office Depot, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit B) (Burden, Jack) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER to Show Cause: Show Cause Response due by 3/2/2021. Plaintiff may Respond by 3/12/2021. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/5/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/5/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 2/20/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 3/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District, Case Number A-20-823171-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6358942) by Office Depot, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Index Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H) (Burden, Jack) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (DRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jenkins v. Office Depot, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Office Depot, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jack P. Burden |
| Represented By: | Jeremy R Robins |
| Represented By: | Jacquelyn Michelle Franco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Samuel Jenkins | |
| Represented By: | Michael T Nixon |
| Represented By: | Eric P Roy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
