Vanhaitsma v. Saul
Plaintiff: William M. Vanhaitsma
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2021cv00482
Filed: March 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER approving ECF No. #5 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Ashish Agrawal for William M. Vanhaitsma and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Hal Taylor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 3/25/2021. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Ashish A. Agrawal and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Hal Taylor (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-6418988) by Plaintiff William M. Vanhaitsma. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Cert.Good.Stan.PA, #2 Exhibit Cert.Good.Stand.EastDist.PA, #3 Exhibit Cert.Good.Stand.NJ) (Taylor, Hal)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul re #1 Complaint. (DRS)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (DRS)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by William M. Vanhaitsma. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6417950) by William M. Vanhaitsma. Proof of service due by 6/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, #2 Summons OGC, #3 Summons USAG, #4 Summons USAO). NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Modified on 3/24/2021 (DRS).
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (AF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vanhaitsma v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William M. Vanhaitsma
Represented By: Hal Taylor
Represented By: Ashish Agrawal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?