Montero Vivos v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Edgar Montero Vivos |
ICE, Erika Campbell, Matthew Cantrell, Gabriel C Ruiz, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Nye County Jail |
2:2021cv00672 |
April 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Elayna J Youchah |
Deportation |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Filer's account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #1 . Attorney Hardeep Sull is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (YAW) |
Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0978-6459340) by Edgar Montero Vivos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Sull, Hardeep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.