Hardin v. United States Congress General Assembly
Lewis Hardin |
California State Legislature, United States Department of Defense, United States Department Of Justice, California Secretary of State, Clara Foltz Criminal Justice Center, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, California Attorney General, Judicial Council of California and United States Congress General Assembly |
2:2021cv01042 |
May 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Andrew P Gordon |
Brenda Weksler |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER Denying #1 Motion to Confirm the Arbitration Award without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 2 NOTICE that this case, formerly Misc. Case No. 2:21-ms-00042, having become a contested proceeding on 5/28/2021, has been converted to the regular civil docket and has been assigned case number 2:21-cv-1041. All future pleadings must be filed in the civil action and must bear said civil case number. (YAW) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (YAW) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award by Petitioner Lewis Hardin. Responses due by 6/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Final Arbitration Award, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Filing Fee $49 - #NVLAS075703) (YAW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.