Anderson v. State of Nevada 8th Dist Court et al
| Anthony K. Anderson |
| State of Nevada, Charles Thompson, State of Nevada 8th Dist Court, Attorney General of the State of Nevada and W Hutchings |
| 2:2021cv01157 |
| June 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Full Complete File by Petitioner Anthony K. Anderson. Responses due by 8/23/2021. (JQC) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Judgment, by Petitioner Anthony K. Anderson. Filing fee Due $ 505. E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. (JQC) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Order on Motion/Application to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Anthony K. Anderson. E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. NOTE: Filing Fee of $505 has not been received. (YAW) Modified text on 8/10/2021 (YAW). |
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT in favor of Respondents, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, State of Nevada, State of Nevada 8th Dist Court, Charles Thompson, and W Hutchings against Petitioner Anthony K. Anderson. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 7/22/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW) |
Filing 7
ORDER Granting #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ORDER Denying #4 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. ORDER Denying #5 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition. ORDER denying #6 Motion of State Courts' Denial of Due Process Due to Usurpation. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that that the Clerk is directed to ADD Aaron Ford, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents and to provide copies of this order and all prior filings to the Attorney General in a manner consistent with the Clerk's current practice. See Order for additional information. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED as an unauthorized second or successive petition, and no certificate of appealability will issue. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this action. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/21/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION of State Courts' Denial of Due Process Due to Usurpation by Petitioner Anthony K. Anderson. Responses due by 8/4/2021. (YAW) |
| Filing 5 MOTION Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition by Petitioner Anthony K. Anderson. Responses due by 8/4/2021. (YAW) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Anthony K. Anderson. (YAW) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Anthony K. Anderson. (YAW) Modified on 7/22/2021 (EDS). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against State of Nevada 8th Dist Court, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:21-cv-01157-JAD-DJA. (HAM) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Anthony K. Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Motion for Counsel, #3 Application for Leave to File Second Petition, #4 Motion and Exhibits) (HAM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
