Devlin v. Hutchings et al
Pierre Devlin |
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and W Hutchings |
2:2021cv01266 |
July 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Attorney General of the State of Nevada, W Hutchings against Pierre Devlin. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 7/6/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, all pending motions are denied. A certificate of appealability is DENIED because jurists of reason would not find debatable whether the court is correct in dismissing this action. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/6/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF -cc: Copy of Petition, Petition and IFP sent to P - JQC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Hutchings et al, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:21-cv-01266-JAD-DJA. (JQC) |
Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Ex Parte Motion for Appointment of Counsel) (JQC) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.