Farvela v. Matousek et al
| Saul Farvela |
| Matousek, Perkins, Lima, Garcia, Jeremy Bean, Gary Piccinini, Gary Dreesen, Calvin Johnson, Harold Wickham and Charles Daniels |
| 2:2021cv01720 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Denying #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IFP/Filing fees due 11/22/2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application. (Attached for distribution to P via HDSP Law Library)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will retain #1 -1 the complaint but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Instructions/Form) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (MR) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Saul Farvela. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (MR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
