Johnson v. State of Nevada
Malcolm Johnson |
State of Nevada, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Darius Starkes and Nicholas Trutanich |
2:2021cv01982 |
October 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
Nancy J Koppe |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Order on Motion/Application to Proceed in forma pauperis addressed to Malcolm Johnson. Envelope marked: "Return to Sender, Unable to Forward." (YAW) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #2 Advisory Letter Pro Se non-habeas addressed to Malcolm Johnson. (HAM) |
Filing 3 ORDER Denying without prejudice #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED that the Clerk to send Plaintiff a blank application form. Payment of filing fees due 12/1/2021. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application form)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRS) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Malcolm Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (DRS) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (YAW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.