Lopez v. GEICO Casualty Company
Erick Lopez |
GEICO Casualty Company |
2:2021cv02020 |
November 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
Gloria M Navarro |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Erick Lopez. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hamilton, Ryan) |
Filing 9 NON-OPPOSITION to #6 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Erick Lopez. (Hamilton, Ryan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Ryan Andrew Hamilton on behalf of Plaintiff Erick Lopez. (Hamilton, Ryan) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. Responses due by 11/30/2021. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/9/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 11/24/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 12/9/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by GEICO Casualty Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Other Affiliate Government Employees Insurance Company for GEICO Casualty Company added. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court Clark County Nevada, Case Number A-21-842646-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6693939) by GEICO Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carlson, Jonathan) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lopez v. GEICO Casualty Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Erick Lopez | |
Represented By: | Ryan Andrew Hamilton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GEICO Casualty Company | |
Represented By: | Jonathan W Carlson |
Represented By: | Frank A. Toddre, II |
Represented By: | Tayler D. Martinez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.