Stewart v State of Nevada, et al
Charles Eric Stewart |
State of Nevada ex rel and William Gitterre |
2:2021cv02088 |
November 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Cam Ferenbach |
Andrew P Gordon |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER - This matter, the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, is Referred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Clerk is directed to administratively close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, Ad Hoc 9th Circuit Court - DRS) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (HAM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0978-6706563) by CHARLES ERIC STEWART. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix, #3 Appendix, #4 Appendix, #5 Appendix, #6 Appendix, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Green, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.