Holstein v. Transunion, LLC et al
| Daniel Holstein |
| Transunion, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Avant, LLC |
| 2:2021cv02199 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Extend Time - Transunion, LLC answer due 2/21/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/7/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (Second Request) for Trans Union to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Transunion, LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement as to Avant, LLC by Daniel Holstein. (Tzall, Robert) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #5 Motion to Extend Time - Transunion, LLC answer due 2/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/6/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate Vantagescore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. added. (Gordon, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 2/20/2022.(Gordon, Benjamin) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Transunion, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent TransUnion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holding, Inc. for Transunion, LLC added. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) for Trans Union to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Transunion, LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jennifer Rebecca Bergh on behalf of Defendant Transunion, LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Avant, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Transunion, LLC re #1 Complaint. (DRS) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Daniel Holstein. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Tzall, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Avant, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Transunion, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6731408) by Daniel Holstein. Proof of service due by 3/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons avant, #3 Summons experian, #4 Summons tu) (Tzall, Robert) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (DRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
