Fox v. Johnson et al
Derek Ryan Fox |
Calvin Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
2:2022cv00669 |
April 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Andrew P Gordon |
Elayna J Youchah |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RESPONSE to ECF No. #5 Order to Show Cause, by Petitioner Derek Ryan Fox. (DRM) |
Filing 5 ORDER. It Is Therefore Ordered that petitioner Derek Ryan Fox must file a Response to Order to Show Cause, by 06/24/2022 showing why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice because of his failure to exhaust his claims in state court. Show Cause Response due by 6/24/2022. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/19/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE) |
Filing 4 FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by Petitioner Derek Ryan Fox. (HKL) |
Filing 3 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Calvin Johnson and Attorney General State of Nevada, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:22-cv-00669-APG-EJY. (KF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Derek Ryan Fox. (KF) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 - PAID) by Derek Ryan Fox. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 NVLAS080736) (KF) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (LOE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.