Prendeville et al v. J. P. Morgan Chase Bank et al
| John Prendeville and Marlene Prendeville |
| J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, Mccarthy, Holthius LLP and Quality Loan Corp |
| 2:2022cv00702 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Denying 2 Plaintiffs' Ex-Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/2/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
|
| Filing 4 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (YAW) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Holthius LLP, J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, Mccarthy, Quality Loan Corp (Filing fee $402) by John Prendeville, Marlene Prendeville. Proof of service due by 7/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Receipt NVLAS080861) (YAW) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (LOE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
