Reed v. State of Nevada et al
Petitioner: Max Reed, II
Respondent: State of Nevada, Washoe County District Attorney Office, DA Chris Hicks, Aaron Ford and Chris Hicks
Case Number: 2:2022cv01763
Filed: October 20, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Gordon
Referring Judge: Elayna J Youchah
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without having to prepay the full filing fee (ECF No. #1 ) is DENIED. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this order is entered to have the $5.00 filing fee sent to the Clerk of Court. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk is directed to retain the petition but not file it at this time. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/22/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
November 21, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Petitioner Max Reed, II. Address updated to HDSP. (HAM)
October 21, 2022 Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (HKL)
October 20, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Max Reed, II. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Constitutional Challenge) (HKL)
October 20, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (HKL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reed v. State of Nevada et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Max Reed, II
Represented By: Southern Desert Correctional Center
Represented By: HDSP Law Library
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Washoe County District Attorney Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DA Chris Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Aaron Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Chris Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?