Pete's Big TVs v. AG Light and Sound Inc.
Petes Big TVs Inc. |
AG Light and Sound Inc. |
2:2024cv00315 |
February 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Andrew P Gordon |
Nancy J Koppe |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that defendant AG Light and Sound Inc.'s #14 certificate of interested parties is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant file a proper certificate of interested parties by April 12, 2024. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/29/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi) |
Filing 14 STRICKEN per #15 Order. CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by AG Light and Sound Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kelley, Jacquelyn) Modified on 3/29/2024 (AMMi). |
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE. To date, a Certificate of Interested Parties has not been filed, pursuant to LR 7.1-1, by AG Light and Sound Inc.. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 4/3/2024. (no image attached) (HAM) |
Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE. To date, a Certificate of Interested Parties has not been filed, pursuant to LR 7.1-1, by AG Light and Sound Inc.. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 3/27/2024. (no image attached) (HAM) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by AG Light and Sound Inc.. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 3/18/2024. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 4/22/2024.(Kelley, Jacquelyn) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Petes Big TVs Inc. re #4 Summons Issued. AG Light and Sound Inc. served on 2/15/2024. (Hart, Steven) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Petes Big TVs Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hart, Steven) |
Filing 7 ORDER Striking Certificate of Interested Parties. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Petes Big TVs, Inc.s certificate of interested parties #5 is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a) (2). The certificate does not identify the citizenship of the plaintiff as required by the amendment to that rule. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the plaintiff to file a proper certificate of interested parties by February 29, 2024. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/15/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) |
Filing 6 ORDER re #5 Certificate of Interested Parties. Each non-governmental party is required to file a certificate of interested parties concurrently with its first appearance in a case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(b)(1); Local Rule 7.1-1(c). Plaintiff failed to do so. Accordingly, Plaintiff must file a certificate of interested parties no later than February 21, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/14/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) |
Filing 5 STRICKEN per #7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Petes Big TVs Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Takos, Zachary) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to AG Light and Sound Inc. re #1 Complaint. (CAH) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (CAH) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Pete's Big TVs. (Takos, Zachary) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Pete's Big TVs. (Takos, Zachary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AG Light and Sound Inc. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7586555) by Pete's Big TVs. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/23/2024. Proof of service due by 5/13/2024. (Takos, Zachary) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pete's Big TVs v. AG Light and Sound Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Petes Big TVs Inc. | |
Represented By: | Steven Hart |
Represented By: | Zachary P. Takos |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: AG Light and Sound Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jacquelyn J. Kelley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.