Chess v. Pieper et al
Markiquse Chess |
Troy Gardiner Pieper and Pieper New York-Multistate Bar Review,LTD. |
2:2024cv00466 |
March 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Nancy J Koppe |
Cristina D Silva |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (MAM) |
Filing 20 SCHEDULING ORDER denying #18 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 9/9/2024. Motions due by 10/9/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/8/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/29/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM) |
Filing 19 REPLY to Response to #15 Motion to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Markiquse Chess. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Wise, Shannon) |
Filing 18 Joint Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Markiquse Chess. (Wise, Shannon) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE to #15 Motion to Remand to State Court by Defendant Troy Gardiner Pieper. Replies due by 4/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Finch, Renee) |
Filing 16 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Troy Gardiner Pieper. (Finch, Renee) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Markiquse Chess. Responses due by 4/22/2024. (Wise, Shannon) |
Filing 14 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Cristina D. Silva. Judge Silva's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to #9 Order to Show Cause, by Defendant Troy Gardiner Pieper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Finch, Renee) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Pieper New York-Multistate Bar Review,LTD.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Terry, Brian) |
Filing 11 Defendant Pieper New York-Multistate Bar Review, LTD ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by Pieper New York-Multistate Bar Review,LTD..(Terry, Brian) |
Filing 10 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Troy Gardiner Pieper. (Finch, Renee) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. IT IS ORDERED that Pieper is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, by 4/1/2024, why this case should not be remanded for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 3/19/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Troy Gardiner Pieper. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Finch, Renee) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Markiquse Chess. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Claggett, Sean) |
Filing 6 Defendant Troy Gardiner Pieper's ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by Troy Gardiner Pieper. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 3/23/2024. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 4/27/2024.(Finch, Renee) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 5 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must file an amended certificate of interested parties by 3/15/2024, fully identifying the citizenship attributed to him. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/13/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Markiquse Chess. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Claggett, Sean) |
Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that each party must file its certificate of interested parties no later than 3/15/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/12/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Cristina D. Silva on 3/11/2024. Statement regarding removed action is due by 3/26/2024. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 4/10/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Cristina D. Silva and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (JQC) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Clark County District Court, Case Number A-24-884959-C, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7611238) by Troy Gardiner Pieper. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 3/17/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Finch, Renee) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.