Dillard v. Lovell et al
| James H Dillard, II |
| Damon Lovell, Kenneth 4 Rucker, Marquis Platt and Marquis Edwards |
| 2:2024cv01143 |
| June 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Damon Lovell, Marquis Platt, Kenneth 4 Rucker by James H Dillard, II. (Filed per #3 Order - ALZ) |
Filing 3
SCREENING ORDER. ORDER Granting #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must detach and separately file Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. Plaintiff must file an Amended Complaint by August 12, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 7/12/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (ALZ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James H Dillard II. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Attachment)(ALZ) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (ALZ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
