Taylor v. Validity Research, Inc. et al
Shundell Taylor |
Validity Research, Inc. and KGS Research, Inc. |
2:2024cv01309 |
July 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER Granting #14 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Richard L. Etter for KGS Research, Inc. and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Noel M. Hernandez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 8/30/2024. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) |
Filing 14 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Richard L. Etter and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Noel M. Hernandez (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7794709) by Defendants KGS Research, Inc., Validity Research, Inc.. (Hernandez, Noel) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Richard L. Etter to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. The form is available on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is required to register for the court's electronic filing system at PACER #www.pacer.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 8/29/2024. (no image attached) (WJ) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by KGS Research, Inc., Validity Research, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hernandez, Noel) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by KGS Research, Inc., Validity Research, Inc.. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 8/25/2024. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/29/2024.(Hernandez, Noel) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Verified Petition for Permission for Nicholas Conlon to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Shundell Taylor and approving Designation of Local Counsel as to Roger Wenthe, PPLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 7/31/2024. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT) |
Filing 9 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Nicholas Conlon and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Roger Wenthe (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7761168) by Plaintiff Shundell Taylor. (Wenthe, Roger) |
Filing 8 ORDER Granting #7 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Edmund Celiesius and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Roger Wenthe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 7/25/2024. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) |
Filing 7 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Edmund Celiesius and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Roger Wenthe (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7755347) by Plaintiff Shundell Taylor. (Wenthe, Roger) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to KGS Research, Inc., Validity Research, Inc. re #1 Complaint. (RJDG) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Nicholas Conlon, Edmund C. Celiesius to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. The form is available on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is required to register for the court's electronic filing system at PACER #www.pacer.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 8/2/2024. (no image attached) (RJDG) |
Filing 4 OPTION TO DECLINE MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVERSEEING YOUR CASE. The attached form must be filed in the docket or received by the Clerk within 21 days of your first appearance in the case should you choose to decline consent. (A copy of the form has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (RJDG) |
Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER 2023-11 IN RE: CONSENT AND REFERRALS TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGES UNDER 28 U.S.C. 636. (A copy of the General Order has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (RJDG) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Shundell Taylor. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Wenthe, Roger) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shundell Taylor (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7750935) by Shundell Taylor. (CLASS ACTION) Certificate of Interested Parties due by 7/29/2024. Proof of service due by 10/17/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Defendant Validity Research, Inc., #4 Summons Defendant KGS Research, Inc.) (Wenthe, Roger) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (RJDG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.