Patterson v. State of Nevada
| Donnail A Patterson |
| State of Nevada |
| 2:2024cv02332 |
| December 13, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Maximiliano D Couvillier |
| Cristina D Silva |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT in favor of State of Nevada against Donnail A. Patterson. This case is dismissed without prejudice. Case closed. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 1/28/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi) |
Filing 4
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice based on Patterson's failure to submit a complaint and file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the full $405 filing fee in compliance with this court's December 20, 2024, order. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. No other documents may be filed in this now-closed case. If Patterson wishes to pursure his claims, he must file a complaint in a new case and either pay the required filing fee or properly apply for in forma pauperis status. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 1/28/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER - It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is denied as incomplete. It is further ordered that Plaintiff has until January 17, 2025, to accomplish the following two items: 1) File a complaint using the correct form for federal court. 2) Either pay the full $405 filing fee or file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis with all three of the following required documents. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff: (1) this Courts approved 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form with instructions, and (2) this Courts approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for an inmate with instructions. (Mailed 12/23/2024). Signed by Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III on 12/20/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CAH) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Donnail A Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(CAH) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Cristina D. Silva and Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III. (CAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patterson v. State of Nevada | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Nevada | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donnail A Patterson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
