CHAPEN v. MUNOZ et al.
| 3:2006cv00353 |
| June 24, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Brian E. Sandoval |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT - State of Nevada, ex.rel., its Dept of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of State Parks' 22 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are dismissed. Plaintiff's claim for violation of the FMLA is dismissed. Plaintiff's claim for negligence against the State is dismissed Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 2/26/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING State of Nevada, ex.rel., its Dept of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of State Parks' 22 Motion to Dismiss. P's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are dismissed. P's claim for violation of the FMLA is dismissed. P's claim for negligence against the State is dismissed. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Brian E. Sandoval on 2/25/209. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CHAPEN v. MUNOZ et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
