Kenner v. Benedetti et al
Petitioner: James Jefferson Kenner
Respondent: James Benedetti and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2008cv00489
Filed: November 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Carson City
Presiding Judge: Robert A. McQuaid
Presiding Judge: Edward C. Reed
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the 14 first amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 3/20/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
March 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 14 first amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. FURTHER ORDERED, the Clerk SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY. FURTHER ORDERED, the petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/19/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that P's 40 , 42 , and 43 motions are DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 12/13/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that P's 35 Motion for Writ to Issue is DENIED. FURTH ORD that Rs shall have five days from entry of this Order to serve the Answer upon P and to file w/the Court an Affidavit or Declaration attesting to such service. FURTH ORD that P shall have thirty days from the date of service to file his reply. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 1/26/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
December 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's 31 motion to dismiss his unexhausted claims is GRANTED. This case shall proceed on part one of ground one only, the claim that trial counsel failed, without petitioner's consent, to f ile a notice of appeal after his sentencing. All other claims are dismissed as abandoned. FURTHER ORDERED, respondents shall file an answer to the remaining claim in this action within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of entry of this order. Petitioner is granted fourteen (14) days thereafter to file a reply. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 12/06/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
November 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Rs' 23 Motion to Dismiss : The court finds parts two and three of ground one to be unexhausted, ground two to be entirely unexhausted, and ground three to be entirely unexhausted. FURTHER ORDERED tha t to the extent that P attempts to include the five additional legal theories in ground three as separate claims, they are DISMISSED as vague and conclusory and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. FURTHER ORDERED that P sh all by 12/9/2010 show good cause for his failure to exhaust his unexhausted claims, Rs shall thereafter have twenty (20) days to respond. P shall thereafter have fifteen (15) days to reply. FURTHER ORDERED that alternatively, P may advise the court o f his desire to abandon the unexhausted claims by filing a sworn declaration of abandonment, signed by P, himself. This declaration shall be filed within the thirty days allowed to show cause for non-exhaustion. If P files such a sworn declaration, t his petition will proceed on part one of ground one only. FURTHER ORDERED that P's failure to respond to this order will result in the dismissal of this amended petition as a mixed petition containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims.( Show Cause/Advisement re exhaustion due by 12/9/2010.) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 11/8/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kenner v. Benedetti et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Jefferson Kenner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Benedetti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?