STIVERSON v. Astrue

Plaintiff: CAROLINE STIVERSON
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2008cv00567
Filed: October 23, 2008
Court: Nevada District Court
Office: Social Security: HIA Office
County: Washoe
Referring Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Howard D. McKibben
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 15, 2009 15 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting 11 Motion to Remand filed by CAROLINE STIVERSON; and denying 12 Cross Motion to affirm filed by Michael J. Astrue; and recommending this case be remanded to the ALJ for a full hearing. Objections to R&R due by 10/1/2009 Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 9/15/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STIVERSON v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAROLINE STIVERSON
Represented By: John C. Boyden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.