Naylon et al vs Wittrig, et al
| Dominique Naylon, Daniel B. O'Dell and Linda Hess |
| John Wittrig, Kristine Mallison, Geotheral Rail Industrial Development, LLC, Herbert & Edeltraut Ruppell, Jean P Irissarry, Jurgeon Schlicker, Justo & Maria Jimerena, Joseph Louden, Jewel E Lewis, Roy and Erenestine West, Renee Ruppel, Orville and Dorothy Ridenour, Curtis and Lisa Anne Smith, John W. and Sylvia J McGee, Jason & Tristi Boldt, Peggy L Parker, Willie Ruppel and Marianne Ruppel |
| 3:2008cv00625 |
| November 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Securities/Commodities Office |
| Washoe |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration to enforce and clarify settlement agreement (ECF No. 150 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/3/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDERED that Ps' # 122 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (#122) is GRANTED. Ds are prohibited from modifying the Promissory Note and Short Form Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents in the principal sum of $450,000.00 in favor of Ps and executed by D Geothermal Rail on July 29, 2005. FURTHER ORDERED that Ds shall have 7 days to respond to Ps' # 123 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Ps shall have 3 days to reply. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for Tuesday, June 19, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Reno Courtroom 5 before Judge Larry R. Hicks. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/4/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDERED that the Individual Ds' # 84 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORD that Ps' # 85 Motion to Stay Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Ps' Claim for Declaratory Relief (#85) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. To the extent Ps seek a stay of briefing and consideration of the Individual Ds' motion for summary judgment, the motion is DENIED as moot. Construed as a request for extension of time to file a response to the motion for summary judgment, the motion is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Construed as a request to reopen discovery, the motion is GRANTED and the matter is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for scheduling. FURTHER ORD that the Individual Ds' Request for Oral Argument on Ps' # 101 Motion to Stay Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/10/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
