Willis v. McDaniel et al
| Rayford Carlos Willis |
| McDaniel and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2009cv00172 |
| April 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Washoe |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Edward C. Reed |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that P's 21 motion to change venue is DENIED as moot. FURTH ORD that P's 22 and 23 motions for reconsideration are DENIED. FURTH ORD that P shall file no further documents in this closed action. If P attempts to file further documents, the Clerk of Court shall return such documents to petitioner, unfiled. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 2/3/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
|
|
Filing
20
JUDGMENT - Rs' 11 motion to dismiss the petition is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that P is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 12/10/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING Rs' 11 Motion to Dismiss the petition. FURTHER ORD P is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. FURTHER ORD Clerk SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 12/9/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
