Nolan v. Palmer et al
Petitioner: Ricky Nolan
Respondent: Jack Palmer, Catherine Cortez-Masto and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Case Number: 3:2009cv00188
Filed: April 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Pershing
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Robert A. McQuaid
Presiding Judge: Brian E. Sandoval
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 125 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 9/28/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
December 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's 99 motion for status check is GRANTED. The court advises petitioner that his petition is fully briefed on the merits. The court will issue a ruling on the petition in due course. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/9/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
August 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that P's 79 motion for an extension of time is GRANTED. FURTH ORD that all other pending motions are DENIED for the reasons set forth in this order. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/26/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
December 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED, petitioner's 66 motion for appointment of counsel for investigative purposes is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED, petitioner's 67 motion for "recusal" of Deputy Attorney General Dennis Wilson is DENIED as without legal basis. FURTHER ORDERED, petitioner's 68 motion entitled, "Extension of Time/Denial of Right to Respond by District Court Failure to Serve Petitioner in a Timely Fashion by Attorney Office" is GRANTED and shall have to and including January 15, 2011, to file his reply to respondents' 64 answer. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/10/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
November 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents' 55 motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Respondent are granted to and including November 19, 2010, to file their response to the petition. FURTHER ORDERED, the 54 and 58 motions s eeking a ruling on his "claims deemed barred/unanswered" are DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED, petitioner's motion for extension of time is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/29/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
September 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Rs' 25 mtn to dismiss is GRANTED as to grnds 10, 12-17, 23-24, 26, 31, 36-39, 41, 43, 45-52, 53(c), 54, 57, 59, 62, 66-68, 70, 72, 78, 81-82, 94, and 98. These grounds are DISMISSED. FURTH ORD that Rs&# 039; 25 mtn is DENIED as to grnds 1, 4, and 7 and the compulsory process claim in grnd 1 are procedurally barred based on law of the case. FURTH ORD that Rs' 25 mtn is DENIED as to 5, 6, and 59. FURTH ORD that 5, 6, and 59 are DISMISSED. FURTH ORD that Rs' 25 mtn is GRANTED as to grnds 2, 18-22, 27, 33-34, 39-41, 46-48, 52, 53(a), and 53(c). These grnds are DISMISSED. FURTH ORD that Rs' 25 mtn is GRANTED as to portions of grnds 18, 19, 20, 21, 2 2, 23, 24, 27, 29, 34, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53: (see order for specifics). These portions of these claims are DISMISSED. FURTH ORD that Rs' 25 mtn is GRANTED as to grnd 2. This grnd is DISMISSED. FURTH ORD that Rs' [25 ] mtn is GRANTED as to grnds 55, 64, 66, 67, 71, 78-79, 82-83, and 90. These grnds are DISMISSED. FURTH ORD that Rs' 25 mtn is GRANTED as to portions of grnds 57, 60, 62, 68, 70, 76, 86, 97, 99: (see order for specifics). These p ortions of these grnds for relief are DISMISSED. FURTH ORD that P's 42 mtn for stay is DENIED. FURTH ORD that P's 45 mtn for appt of cnsl is DENIED. FURTH ORD that P's 46 mtn for discovery is DENIED. FURTH ORD that P's 49 motion to commute and restructure sentences is DENIED. FURTH ORD that P's 50 mtn for evidentiary hearing is DENIED. FURTH ORD that Rs SHALL FILE an answer to the remaining grnds for relief, or portions thereof, w/in 30 days of the date of service of this action. P may file a reply w/in 30 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/20/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nolan v. Palmer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ricky Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jack Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Catherine Cortez-Masto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?