Lee et al v. Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc., a California corporation et al
| Richard F Lee and Aunetta M Roach |
| Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc., a California corporation, Greenhead Investments, Inc., a California corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Regional Service Corporation, a California corporation |
| 3:2009cv00590 |
| October 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Washoe |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| None |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss 81 isGRANTED. Defendant Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc. and Greenhead Investment, Inc. are DISMISSED as defendants as to the remanded claims.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants motion to dismiss and expunge lis pendens 86 is GRANTED in-part and DENIED in-part in accordance with this order. DefendantGreenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. is DISMISSED as a defendant as to the remanded claims.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/3/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's 75 motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the stay in case no. 3:09-cv-0590-LRH-RAM entered on 3/6/2010, is hereby LIFTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants have twenty (20) days after the issuance of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the remanded claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 7/19/2011.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/28/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
68
CERTIFIED COPY OF AMENDED MDL ORDER OF REMAND - MDL Docket No. 09-2119-JAT : Motions to Remand Certain Claims are granted as follows: Claims 8-10 and part of claims 1-5, 7 and 14 remain with the undersigned as part of the MDL and claim 6 and part of claims 1-5, 7 and 14 have been remanded to the transferor court. ( see order for additional specifics ) Signed by MDL Judge James A. Teilborg on 3/21/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 37 defendants' Motion to Stay the proceedings pending a decision of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in this case are stayed pending Judge Teilborg's order to remand defendants and claims back to this court. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/5/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying 4 plaintiffs' Motion to Remand to State Court; and denying as moot 8 plaintiffs' Motion to Stay. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/14/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
