Kempvanee v. Skolnik et al
Plaintiff: Thomas Kempvanee
Defendant: Buck, Jack Palmer and Howard Skolnik
Case Number: 3:2010cv00535
Filed: August 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Edward C. Reed
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDERED that the # 52 Report and Recommendation is well taken and is APPROVED and ADOPTED. FURTHER ORD that Ds' # 36 Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 2/6/2012. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's 53 motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The court's prior 51 order remains in full force and effect. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) Modified on 3/13/2012 to correct minutes of the court date. (KO)
February 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 2/6/2012. By Deputy Clerk: Lisa Mann. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions 43 is DENIED because plaintiff failed to serve the motion upon defendants prior to filing it with the court. Because, this information is not necessary to the court's analysis of defendants' motion for summary judgment, defendants' motion 48 is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
August 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER DENYING P's 27 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 8/22/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
June 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 6/6/2011. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's 19 motion to join the United States or U.S. representative party is DENIED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kempvanee v. Skolnik et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buck
Represented By: Richard J Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Palmer
Represented By: Richard J Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard Skolnik
Represented By: Richard J Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Kempvanee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?